From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Luster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 293 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-10749

Submitted May 9, 2003.

June 2, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered November 28, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Bertrand J. Kahn of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Benjamin A. Darche of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People adduced legally sufficient evidence at trial to establish that the complainant sustained physical injury (see Penal Law § 10.00), so as to support his conviction for robbery in the second degree (see Penal Law § 160.10[a]). At trial, the evidence showed that the defendant grabbed the complainant by her hair and threw her to the ground. He then jumped on top of her and punched her in the mouth and snatched a chain from her neck. After the incident, the complainant was bleeding from her arm, leg, and neck, and Emergency Medical Service workers treated her for her injuries. She also missed a week of work as a result of the incident, and had pain for about a month after it.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Guidice, 83 N.Y.2d 630, 636; People v. Bogan 70 N.Y.2d 860; People v. Burris, 275 A.D.2d 793, affd 96 N.Y.2d 884; People v. Tucker, 221 A.D.2d 670). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Luster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 293 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Luster

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ANTHONY LUSTER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 293 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 671

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Ercole

Courts have consistently found injuries similar to those sustained by Rosario as sufficient evidence of…

People v. Jones

However, she also testified that when she returned to work, her face was “burning,” and that the wound took…