From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Luna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1988
136 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

January 11, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The United States Customs Inspector's pat-down search of the defendant, during which he seized a quantity of cocaine, was reasonable in that the Inspector possessed an articulable suspicion that the defendant was concealing contraband (see, People v Materon, 107 A.D.2d 408). The defendant was traveling alone, carrying one suitcase, with few items, appeared overly nervous and agitated and was arriving from a country with a high profile for illegal drug trade. This conduct justified the minimally intrusive pat-down which led to the drug discovery.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter imposed. Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Luna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1988
136 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Luna

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JULIO LUNA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

She had just disembarked from an international flight originating in a drug-source area and appeared overly…

People v. McKeown

In this respect, appearance and demeanor alone may provide a sufficient articulable suspicion to justify the…