From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lugo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1998
256 A.D.2d 16 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Silverman, J.).


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The People properly established a chain of custody with respect to the drugs underlying the sale count, upon which defendant was convicted, and his arguments concerning the separate drugs underlying the possession count are rendered academic by virtue of the fact that he was not convicted of that count.

The court's Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion ( see, People v. Pavao, 59 N.Y.2d 282, 292).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Lugo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1998
256 A.D.2d 16 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Lugo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUIS LUGO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 16 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

State v. Whaley

The claim raised in point 1 of the defendant's brief is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event,…