From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lorick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2009
59 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2006-01309.

February 10, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered December 6, 2005, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Robert H. Middlemiss and Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Carni and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings.

The plea minutes reveal that the defendant was not informed, prior to entering his plea, that his sentence would necessarily include a period of postrelease supervision. Therefore, the plea must be vacated ( see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245; People v Bernard, 53 AD3d 586 ; People v Cook, 49 AD3d 777; People v Thompson, 47 AD3d 648).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contention that the sentence was excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Lorick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2009
59 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Lorick

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK LORICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1138
872 N.Y.S.2d 295

Citing Cases

People v. Puntervold

The plea minutes reveal that the defendant was not informed, prior to entering his plea on indictment No.…