Opinion
Argued June 8, 1891
Decided October 6, 1891
William F. Howe for appellant.
McKenzie Semple for respondent.
RUGER, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Argued June 8, 1891
Decided October 6, 1891
William F. Howe for appellant.
McKenzie Semple for respondent.
RUGER, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . MARTIN D. LOPPY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 6, 1891
In this state of the evidence the issue of sanity was a proper subject for final determination by the jury,…
People v. HochHowever, the issue of sanity was submitted to the jury, who were to finally determine it upon the evidence,…