From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lopez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 19, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2017-08634 2017-08635 2017-08636 2017-08637

02-19-2020

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Kareem Lopez, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Eddie Cando on the memorandum), for respondent.


WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. JOHN M. LEVENTHAL ROBERT J. MILLER COLLEEN D. DUFFY HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ. (S.C.I. Nos. 1115/17, 1117/17, 1119/17, 1120/17)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Eddie Cando on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J.), all imposed June 28, 2017, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146). The Supreme Court conflated the waiver of the right to appeal with the defendant's waiver of his right to a trial and failed to confirm that the defendant understood the nature of the right to appeal and the consequences of waiving it (see People v Baker, 174 AD3d 914; People v Alston, 163 AD3d 843, 843-844). Although the record of the proceedings reflects that the defendant authorized his attorney to execute a written waiver of his right to appeal, such act does not, by itself, establish that the defendant gave up his right to appeal knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily (see e.g. People v Brown, 122 AD3d at 145). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude this Court's review of the defendant's excessive sentence claims (see People v Fuller, 163 AD3d 715, 715). However, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

People v. Lopez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 19, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Kareem Lopez…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)