From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lopez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 26, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1135 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-26

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mauro LOPEZ, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Lori Glachman of counsel; Lucas E. Wherry on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Lori Glachman of counsel; Lucas E. Wherry on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), imposed December 20, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Wright, 89 A.D.3d 874, 874–875, 932 N.Y.S.2d 353). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, BELEN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lopez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 26, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1135 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mauro LOPEZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 1135 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6314
950 N.Y.S.2d 712