From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1991
170 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 21, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Bookson, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1991
170 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Long

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VERN LONG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
566 N.Y.S.2d 45

Citing Cases

Sinsheimer v. Park & 66th Corp.

The subject lease is not a commercial lease, but a residential proprietary lease. Residential tenants…