From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lloyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1994
210 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Bernstein, J.).


Defendant's claim that the trial court, sitting without a jury, engaged in premature deliberations was not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05; see, People v Gonzalez, 155 A.D.2d 310, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 813), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, the trial court did not engage in premature deliberations in violation of CPL 320.20 simply by requesting counsel in their summations to "focus" on a particular issue and by observing that its analysis of the case was continuous as the evidence unfolded.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Lloyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1994
210 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Lloyd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LLOYD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 956

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

Defendant's contention that the court's interruptions during summation deprived him of his right to an…

People v. Williams

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record does not reflect that the Supreme Court shifted the burden…