From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lindsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 23, 1992
179 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 23, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Tompkins County (Friedlander, J.).


Despite defendant's claims to the contrary, the evidence supports County Court's conclusion that defendant's judgment of conviction was not procured by duress or coercion, nor was it in violation of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. Defendant contends that although he informed his attorney that he wanted to go to trial, he felt compelled to enter a guilty plea when his attorney informed him that he would lose at trial and that it was too late to get another attorney to represent him. The transcript of the plea allocution indicates, however, that he understood fully the consequences of his plea and that he was neither threatened nor coerced into entering it. Defendant also specifically stated that he had consulted with his attorney regarding all issues in the case and he was satisfied with his attorney's representation. Because the foregoing is inconsistent with defendant's claims, County Court's denial of his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction should be affirmed (see, People v. Grassia, 114 A.D.2d 1039, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 651; see also, People v. Glasper, 151 A.D.2d 692, 693).

Weiss, Acting P.J., Levine, Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Lindsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 23, 1992
179 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Lindsey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT LINDSEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
578 N.Y.S.2d 711

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

A court is permitted to deny a motion to vacate a judgment and no hearing is necessary if the allegations of…

People v. Williams

Moreover, the notations on the copy of the trial folder submitted by the People support their contention that…