From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1998
253 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 24, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.).


Defendant was not denied his right to represent himself. By merely seeking to participate in the defense to the extent of questioning the complainant on cross-examination, defendant never made a timely and unequivocal request to proceed pro se ( see, People v. Cabassa, 79 N.Y.2d 722, 730-731, cert denied sub nom. Lind v. New York, 506 U.S. 1011; People v. Garcia, 69 N.Y.2d 903; People v. Timmons, 199 A.D.2d 8, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 811). Moreover, the record indicates that after being cautioned by the court and counsel, defendant abandoned his request to personally cross-examine the complainant.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1998
253 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDRE LEWIS, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 475

Citing Cases

People v. Ramos

The court did not deprive defendant of his right to represent himself. Defendant never made an unequivocal…