From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 2006
29 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

14310.

May 11, 2006.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered June 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

Martin J. Kehoe III, Albany, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Christopher D. Horn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. She may have waived her right to appeal although no written waiver is contained in the record on appeal. She was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 6½ years to life. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal.

Upon our review of the record, we discern at least one appellate issue of arguable merit concerning the validity and scope of defendant's appeal waiver ( see People v. Billingslea, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v. Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280, 283; People v. Santalucia, 9 AD3d 740). If the appeal waiver is determined to be unenforceable (or to not encompass the sentence), defendant would retain the right to challenge, among other things, the agreed-upon, negotiated sentence as harsh and excessive ( see People v. Billingslea, supra at 253-254, 257; People v. Thompson, 60 NY2d 513, 520). Thus, we cannot conclude that an appeal raising this issue would be "wholly frivolous," although we make no finding as to its ultimate merits ( see People v. Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 636). Accordingly, the application of defendant's current counsel — to be relieved of this assignment — is granted and new counsel will be assigned to address any issues which the record may disclose ( see People v. Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Ordered that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.


Summaries of

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 2006
29 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEXIS LEWIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 11, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3644
813 N.Y.S.2d 686

Citing Cases

State v. Lewis

A waiver of the right to appeal was recited as a term of the plea, although there is no written waiver.…

People v. Zakrzewski

He now appeals. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the…