From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2008
56 A.D.3d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-09571.

November 5, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated September 18, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Denise Fabiano of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.

Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Covello and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court correctly determined that the People met their burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the facts supporting the defendant's designation as a level three sex offender ( see Correction Law § 168-n). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court properly assessed 15 points for the "drug or alcohol abuse" risk factor, as the grand jury testimony and his admissions established that he smoked marijuana at the time of the sex offense ( see People v Conway, 47 AD3d 492, 493).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2008
56 A.D.3d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY LEWIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8467
865 N.Y.S.2d 911

Citing Cases

People v. Victor Cruz

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Supreme Court's determination to…

People v. Sterling

Although the hearing court failed to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by…