From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Leon

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 10, 2015
129 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2014-00286

06-10-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rolando LEON, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Thomas M. Ross, and Arieh Schulman of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Thomas M. Ross, and Arieh Schulman of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated December 13, 2013, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), which sentence was originally imposed on October 24, 2003.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

A defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 enjoys “a presumption in favor of granting a motion for resentencing relief” (People v. Beasley, 47 A.D.3d 639, 641, 850 N.Y.S.2d 140 ; see CPL 440.46 [3] ; L. 2004, ch. 738, § 23). However, resentencing is not automatic, and may be denied upon a showing that “substantial justice dictates” such denial (People v. Beasley, 47 A.D.3d at 641, 850 N.Y.S.2d 140 ; see CPL 440.46 [3] ; L. 2004, ch. 738, § 23; People v. Vega, 40 A.D.3d 1020, 1020–1021, 836 N.Y.S.2d 685 ).

Here, considering all of the circumstances relevant to the defendant's motion, including his conviction of a violent felony and his 24 Tier III prison disciplinary infractions for, inter alia, possessing weapons and gang-related material, drug use, and drug smuggling, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 (see People v. Darwin, 102 A.D.3d 807, 808, 958 N.Y.S.2d 190 ; People v. Alvarez, 93 A.D.3d 674, 939 N.Y.S.2d 704 ; People v. Karim, 85 A.D.3d 943, 944, 925 N.Y.S.2d 835 ).

SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, MILLER and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Leon

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 10, 2015
129 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Leon

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Rolando Leon…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 4865
9 N.Y.S.3d 885