From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 28, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mazzei, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact were raised or considered.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree, after shooting a man who was arguing with a female acquaintance.

After remittitur of this case for a factual reconstruction hearing (Vaughn, J.), it was determined that the defendant was not present at the Sandoval hearing (see, People v. Odiat, 82 N.Y.2d 872). Because the Sandoval ruling was not "wholly favorable" to the defendant, his absence requires reversal of his conviction even though his claim was not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Michalek, 82 N.Y.2d 906; People v. Favor, 82 N.Y.2d 254; People v. Dokes, 79 N.Y.2d 656). We note that the hearing court also determined that the defendant did not waive his right to be present. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Law

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICKY LAW, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 834

Citing Cases

People v. Evans

After remittitur of this case for a factual reconstruction hearing, the Supreme Court determined that the…

People v. Alomar

Here, the Judges served only to fulfill the proper judicial role of passing upon the accuracy of the records…