From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lassiter

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2016
143 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

10-19-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Levy G. LASSITER, appellant.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.


Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered August 20, 2014, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review, since he failed to move to withdraw his guilty plea (see People v. Pryor, 11 A.D.3d 565, 782 N.Y.S.2d 803 ). In any event, the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646 ; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170 ).

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and, thus, constitutes a “mixed claim” of ineffective assistance (People v. Maxwell, 89 A.D.3d 1108, 1109, 933 N.Y.S.2d 386 ; see People v. Rosado, 134 A.D.3d 1133, 22 N.Y.S.3d 235 ). It is not evident from the matter appearing on the record that the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 530 N.Y.S.2d 52, 525 N.E.2d 698 ; People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 998, 457 N.Y.S.2d 238, 443 N.E.2d 486 ; People v. Hernandez, 125 A.D.3d 885, 886–887, 4 N.Y.S.3d 108 ; People v. Maxwell, 89 A.D.3d at 1109, 933 N.Y.S.2d 386 ). Since the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the claim in its entirety (see People v. Renaud, 137 A.D.3d 818, 821, 27 N.Y.S.3d 578 ; People v. Addison, 107 A.D.3d 730, 732, 966 N.Y.S.2d 217 ; People v. Maxwell, 89 A.D.3d at 1109, 933 N.Y.S.2d 386 ).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., DICKERSON, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lassiter

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2016
143 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Lassiter

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Levy G. LASSITER, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 19, 2016

Citations

143 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
143 A.D.3d 917
143 A.D.3d 916
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6846

Citing Cases

People v. Lassiter

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 143 AD3d 915 (Dutchess)…