From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lankey

Michigan Court of Appeals
Feb 2, 1993
497 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 126668, 154456.

Submitted August 4, 1992, at Detroit.

Decided February 2, 1993, at 9:10 A.M.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, John D. O'Hair, Prosecuting Attorney, Timothy A. Baughman, Chief of Research, Training, and Appeals, and Don W. Atkins, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people. Douglas Hamel, for the defendant on appeal.

Before: CORRIGAN, P.J., and MICHAEL J. KELLY and GRIFFIN, JJ.


AFTER REMAND


Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of five counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b(1)(a); MSA 28.788(2) (1)(a), involving his then six-year-old granddaughter. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of two to ten years in prison. The minimum sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines is between eight and ten years.

In our previous opinion, People v Lankey, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, decided September 22, 1992 (Docket Nos. 126668, 154456), we affirmed defendant's convictions but remanded the case to the trial court for reconsideration of the sentences in light of People v Milbourn, 435 Mich. 630; 461 N.W.2d 1 (1990). On remand, the trial court ruled that Milbourn did not apply to sentences that are less than recommended by the guidelines. This ruling is erroneous and contrary to our remand instructions.

The prosecutor contends that defendant's sentences are disproportionately lenient given the gravity of the offense. We agree and accordingly vacate defendant's sentences and remand for resentencing. The resentencing shall occur before a different judge. People v Evans, 156 Mich. App. 68, 72-73; 401 N.W.2d 312 (1986). Also see People v Fisher (After Second Remand), 190 Mich. App. 598, 608-609; 476 N.W.2d 762 (1991), lv gtd 439 Mich. 1002 (1992). We do not retain jurisdiction.

Convictions affirmed, sentences vacated, and case remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

People v. Lankey

Michigan Court of Appeals
Feb 2, 1993
497 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Lankey

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v LANKEY (AFTER REMAND)

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 2, 1993

Citations

497 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993)
497 N.W.2d 571

Citing Cases

People v. Stiller

The Milbourn standard applies to sentences that are below the guidelines. People Lankey (After Remand), 198…

People v. Perry

While cases testing the exercise of sentencing discretion have been brought with greater frequency by…