Opinion
November 6, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Furthermore, there is no showing that the defendant is entitled to a new trial as a result of the prosecutor's alleged failure to disclose the record of conviction of one of the People's witnesses (see, CPL 240.45 [b]). The defense counsel was made aware of the prior conviction and used it for impeachment on cross-examination (see, People v Fuentes, 199 A.D.2d 980; see also, People v Clark, 194 A.D.2d 868, 869).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.