From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Landis

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 11, 1979
91 Mich. App. 345 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

Docket No. 78-5258.

Decided July 11, 1979.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Ronald C. Zellar, Prosecuting Attorney (Prosecuting Attorneys Appellate Service, Leonard J. Malinowski, of counsel), for the people.

Gail Rodwan, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for defendant on appeal.

Before: ALLEN, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and D.E. HOLBROOK, JJ.


Defendant was plea convicted of the charged offense of armed robbery, contrary to MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797, and was sentenced to prison for a term of 7-1/2 to 20 years. He appeals of right and asserts he did not enter his guilty plea understandingly.

Defendant claims error in the trial judge's informing him as follows:

"The armed robbery charge can carry with it, upon conviction, a maximum of life. There is no minimum sentence required under that statute. It is one which does not permit probation as a sentence."

Defendant asserts that there is a mandatory minimum sentence — even though the Courts have not as yet determined what it is. The statute reads in pertinent part: "punishable by imprisonment for life or for any term of years".

We choose to follow the opinion in the case of People v Freeman, 73 Mich. App. 568; 252 N.W.2d 518 (1977), which ruled that there is no mandatory minimum sentence for armed robbery, therefore, a court at a guilty plea proceeding need not advise a defendant of a mandatory minimum prison sentence for armed robbery.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Landis

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 11, 1979
91 Mich. App. 345 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

People v. Landis

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v LANDIS

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 11, 1979

Citations

91 Mich. App. 345 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)
283 N.W.2d 647

Citing Cases

People v. West

Rather, they merely assert that the phrase does not mandate a mandatory minimum sentence without any real…

People v. Taylor

This holding has received support and criticism from various panels of this Court. In People v Landis, 91…