From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lalji

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 5, 2015
133 A.D.3d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

16070, 99047/13

11-05-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. INDERJEET LALJI, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne Gantt of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (David P. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne Gantt of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (David P. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Seth L. Marvin, J.), entered November 6, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). Defendant committed a pattern of sexual acts against a child, and, after his conviction, he repeatedly violated his probation. The 50–year–old defendant's claim that his age minimizes his risk of reoffense is unpersuasive, and there were no other mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the guidelines.

TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, ANDRIAS, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lalji

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 5, 2015
133 A.D.3d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Lalji

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Inderjeet Lalji…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 5, 2015

Citations

133 A.D.3d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8073
18 N.Y.S.3d 536

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure from defendant's…

People v. Hanford

Defendant's good prison disciplinary record was sufficiently taken into account by the risk assessment…