From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Laguer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1992
183 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 12, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (William H. Wallace, III, J.).


Evidence at trial established that police officers executing a search warrant entered defendant's apartment and recovered, inter alia, a cache of loaded and operable handguns, a sawed-off rifle, and two packages of cocaine weighing 36.2 and 34.4 grams.

Defendant's pretrial Sandoval application was granted with respect to a prior conviction for attempted weapon possession. However, the trial court ruled further that cross-examination on that conviction would be permitted if defendant "opened the door" or testified in a false or misleading manner regarding the issues involved.

Defendant then testified on his own behalf that he had nothing to do with the guns and other contraband, which were merely stored in his apartment by a former son-in-law whom defendant feared, and stated repeatedly that he had never even touched the guns because he was, and always had been, "afraid of guns." Thus, the trial court properly ruled that defendant's testimony opened the door for impeachment by questioning regarding his prior conviction (see, e.g., People v. Woods, 165 A.D.2d 798, 800, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 883).

We have considered defendant's additional claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Laguer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1992
183 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Laguer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAUL LAGUER, SR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 401

Citing Cases

People v. Salvadon

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ. When, despite the court's prior warnings…

People v. Griffin

In any event, a testifying defendant is obliged to speak truthfully and cannot use a favorable Sandoval…