From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kusmierz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 05-00395.

September 30, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered February 27, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the second degree and filing a false or fraudulent New York State tax return.

LEIGH E. ANDERSON, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MEGAN P. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Before: Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law § 155.40). The charges arose in connection with the filing of claims for Medicaid reimbursement by defendant, as an agent for a hospital in Pennsylvania, for services that she knew were not provided. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the authority to investigate and prosecute persons for Medicaid fraud was properly conferred upon the Attorney General pursuant to Executive Law § 63 (3) ( see Matter of Mann Judd Landau v. Hynes, 49 NY2d 128, 135; People v. Marketing Adv. Servs. Ctr. Corp., 272 AD2d 982, lv denied 95 NY2d 761; cf. People v. Gilmour, 98 NY2d 126, 133-134). By pleading guilty, defendant waived her contention that the conduct for which she was indicted occurred prior to the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations set forth in CPL 30.10 (2) (b) ( see People v. Dickson, 133 AD2d 492, 494-495; see generally People v. Hansen, 95 NY2d 227, 230-231). In any event, that contention is without merit. The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses her challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see People v. Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827). We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Kusmierz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Kusmierz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THERESE KUSMIERZ, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 1404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7182
801 N.Y.S.2d 207

Citing Cases

People v. Milkowski

December 9, 2005. Appeal from 4th Dept: 21 AD3d 1404 (Erie). Application in criminal case for leave to appeal…

People v. Maize

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention regarding the timeliness of the indictment…