From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kunz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2008
48 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. KA 07-01538.

February 1, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), entered March 21, 2007. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of defendant's omnibus motion seeking to suppress physical evidence.

FRANK J. CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (RAYMOND C. HERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT.

LO TEMPIO BROWN, P.C., BUFFALO (FRANK LO TEMPIO, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the indictment is dismissed.

Memorandum: On this appeal by the People, we conclude that Supreme Court properly suppressed evidence seized by the police during a warrantless search of defendant's residence. As the court properly determined, the People failed to establish by the requisite preponderance of the evidence that the independent contractor hired by a bank to secure the property in anticipation of a foreclosure sale had actual or apparent authority to consent to the search of defendant's residence ( see People v Gonzalez, 88 NY2d 289, 295). [ See 16 Misc 3d 312 (2007).]


Summaries of

People v. Kunz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2008
48 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Kunz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ROBERT KUNZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 791
849 N.Y.S.2d 838