From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Knapp

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 10, 2013
108 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-07-10

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Dylan KNAPP, appellant.

Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Arza Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent.


Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Arza Feldman of counsel), for appellant.Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Freehill, J.), rendered February 8, 2012, convicting him of aggravated vehicular homicide, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal ( see People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222;People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. DeSimone, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108) precludes review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution ( see People v. Devodier, 102 A.D.3d 884, 958 N.Y.S.2d 220) and of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Lewis, 105 A.D.3d 773, 961 N.Y.S.2d 798).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

SKELOS, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Knapp

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 10, 2013
108 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Knapp

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Dylan KNAPP, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 10, 2013

Citations

108 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
968 N.Y.S.2d 381
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5227

Citing Cases

People v. Spencer

In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently…

People v. Spencer

In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently…