From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 1952
280 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

September 22, 1952.

Appeal from County Court of Westchester County.


Defendant's first conviction was in 1912, for the crime of carrying a dangerous weapon in violation of section 1897 of the Penal Law. At that time, the statute provided that such a violation was a felony. Section 1897 was amended in 1915, prior to the date of defendant's conviction and sentence as a fourth offender, so as to constitute the same offense a misdemeanor. Defendant contends that by reason of such amendment, the 1912 conviction should not have been considered a felony conviction for the purpose of sentencing him as a fourth offender under section 1942 of the Penal Law. Order affirmed. Defendant's conviction in 1912 was for a felony under the statute as it then existed, and it is that statute which is controlling and determines the nature and degree of the crime and the applicability of section 1942 of the Penal Law. ( People ex rel. Kruger v. Snyder, 261 App. Div. 352; Matter of Emert v. Thorn, 249 App. Div. 301; People ex rel. Ackers v. Brophy, 258 App. Div. 859; People ex rel. Gwynne v. Lawes, 252 App. Div. 761. ) Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 1952
280 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

People v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JACOB KLEIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

People v. Pacheco

[*] "[*] The court takes note of People v. Klein ( 280 App. Div. 897, affd 305 N.Y. 766), in which it was…

People v. McMillen

The fact that community mores have since undergone change and such conduct is now deemed less reprehensible…