From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1985
114 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

October 15, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

It is well settled that there is no legal distinction between liability as a principal and criminal culpability as an accessory (see, People v Duncan, 46 N.Y.2d 74, cert denied 442 U.S. 910; People v Sasso, 99 A.D.2d 558, 559). By defendant's own admission, he intended to participate in a burglary with Freddie Warren. His role was to act as lookout. In view of defendant's own admissions, it is evident that the allocution was legally sufficient and that his plea of guilty was properly accepted.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find that probable cause existed for defendant's arrest. We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1985
114 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN L. KING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Widger

nt—"is precluded by the ... appeal waiver and, further, is similarly unpreserved" ( People v. Smith, 155…