From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 6, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court did not err in denying his motion to suppress the identification testimony of the undercover officer who purchased narcotics from him on two separate occasions. Although more than one month elapsed between the sales and the defendant's arrest, the officer spontaneously identified the defendant on June 2, 1993, when he unexpectedly encountered the defendant walking along a street in the area where the drug transactions had occurred. Furthermore, the officer's viewing of the defendant on the following day to ensure that the proper person had been arrested was confirmatory in nature and did not taint his subsequent in-court identification (see, People v Morales, 37 N.Y.2d 262; People v Fanfan, 207 A.D.2d 907; People v Lane, 185 A.D.2d 282; People v Knight, 156 A.D.2d 588).

The defendant's further assertion that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his identity as the individual who sold the narcotics to the undercover officer is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

Finally, the defendant's contention that the court's reasonable doubt charge improperly shifted the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defense is also unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Whilby, 204 A.D.2d 370; People v Burney, 192 A.D.2d 543), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247; People v Daniels, 204 A.D.2d 865). Miller, J.P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN L. KING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 505

Citing Cases

People v. McKinney

Although four days elapsed between the drug sale and the arrest, the showup occurred minutes after the…

People v. Hewitt

The hearing court properly declined to suppress the undercover police officer's showup identification of the…