From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 2004
12 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-02628.

November 15, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered February 26, 2001, convicting him of attempted assault upon a police officer, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Before: Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no support in the record for the defendant's contention that the court should have, sua sponte, ordered an additional competency examination pursuant to CPL 730.30 ( see People v. Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757, cert denied 528 US 834; People v. Agaro, 303 AD2d 518). Whether to order a competency examination "lies within the sound discretion of the trial court" and "[t]he trial court was entitled to give weight to the findings and conclusions of competency derived from the most recent examination" ( People v. Morgan, 87 NY2d 878, 879, 880; see People v. Tortorici, supra).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 2004
12 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERT KING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 15, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 863

Citing Cases

People v. Rios

There is no merit to the defendant's contention in his supplemental pro se brief, that the Supreme Court…

People v. Jones

The Supreme Court's determination that the defendant was fit to proceed must be accorded great deference (…