From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1991
169 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 15, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.).


Since the defendant failed to move prior to imposition of sentence to withdraw his plea, he has not preserved for appellate review the claim that the court coerced the plea. (People v Guerrero, 155 A.D.2d 262, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 868.) In any event, the court, in making defendant aware of the possible sentence facing him if convicted, did not coerce the guilty plea (People v Kelly, 159 A.D.2d 227, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 737). Nor, under the circumstances presented, was it coercive for the court to comment on the strength of the People's case.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Wallach and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1991
169 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN KING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Hall

is belied by the record inasmuch as, during the plea proceeding, defendant denied that he had been threatened…