From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 24, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-24-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael A. KING, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Nicholas P. Difonzo of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Lawrence Friedman, District Attorney, Batavia (William G. Zickl of Counsel), for respondent.


The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Nicholas P. Difonzo of Counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Lawrence Friedman, District Attorney, Batavia (William G. Zickl of Counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM: We reject defendant's contention that County Court erred in determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq. ). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant preserved for our review his contention that the court should have granted him a downward departure to a level one risk, we conclude that his contention is without merit. Defendant failed to allege a mitigating circumstance that is, as a matter of law, of a kind or to a degree not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment guidelines and, to the extent that defendant adequately identified a mitigating circumstance, he failed to prove its existence by a preponderance of the evidence (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 ; People v. Voymas, 122 A.D.3d 1336, 1337, 995 N.Y.S.2d 438, lv. denied 25 N.Y.3d 913, 2015 WL 3971379 ; see also People v. Filkins, 128 A.D.3d 1231, 1231–1232, 9 N.Y.S.3d 706, lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 904, 2015 WL 5254877 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, DeJOSEPH, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 24, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael A. KING, Jr.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 24, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
48 N.Y.S.3d 910

Citing Cases

People v. Love

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender…

People v. Augsbury

That omission by the court does not require remittal because the record is sufficient for us to make our own…