From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kendall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 1990
159 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve the issue of an alleged sentence promise for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment on the ground that the court failed to comply with that promise (see, CPL 470.05; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636).

In any event, a review of the record shows that a recommendation against deportation of the defendant was not part of the plea agreement. Since the defendant received the sentence which had been promised, he should not now be heard to complain that it is excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Brown, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kendall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 1990
159 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Kendall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CYRILL KENDALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
553 N.Y.S.2d 208

Citing Cases

People v. Solerwitz

The defendant's claim that his guilty pleas were induced by an unfulfilled sentencing promise is unpreserved…

People v. John

While the defendant seeks to have this Court review his claim that the sentences imposed were improper…