From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Keating

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 12, 2005
21 A.D.3d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

1997-00453.

September 12, 2005.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001 ( People v. Keating, 283 AD2d 589), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered December 13, 1996.

Padraic Keating, Comstock, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Daniel M. Donovan, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Anne Crick of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 US 745; People v. Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

People v. Keating

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 12, 2005
21 A.D.3d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Keating

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PADRAIC KEATING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 12, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6689
800 N.Y.S.2d 646

Citing Cases

Keating v. People

The Appellate Division tersely denied the petition on the merits: "[Keating] has failed to establish that he…

Keating v. New York

The first three of those claims were addressed on the merits. See People v. Keating, 18 N.Y.3d at 934…