From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1993
199 A.D.2d 82 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 14, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.).


The trial court did not err in denying defendant's request, made only after both sides had rested, for a missing witness charge with respect to two men who were part of the crowd chasing defendant before his arrest (see, People v Rosario, 191 A.D.2d 243, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 1019).

In any event, defendant failed to establish that the uncalled witnesses were knowledgeable about a material issue upon which evidence was already in the case or that the witnesses would have testified favorably for the People. (People v Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 427.)

Defendant also claims that the court erred in considering his illegal alien status and prior uncharged crimes in imposing sentence. Defendant's former claim is unpreserved for this Court's review. Nevertheless, the claims are without merit as a court is entitled to consider offenses for which a defendant has not been convicted, in addition to immigration offenses. (People v Khan, 146 A.D.2d 806, 807.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1993
199 A.D.2d 82 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARIEL KAPLAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 82 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
606 N.Y.S.2d 151

Citing Cases

People v. Cesar

zed range of sentences established by the New York State Legislature for the offense at issue ( seeVehicle…

People v. Cesar

range of sentences established by the New York State Legislature for the offense at issue (see Vehicle and…