From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 2005
22 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-07557.

October 3, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered August 11, 2003, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barbara Lerner of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Beverly Kalman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., S. Miller, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge concerning the Supreme Court's charge on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant did not object to the charge as given or request a supplemental charge ( see CPL 470.50; People v Moultrie, 6 AD3d 730; People v. Santos, 280 AD2d 561). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v. Holmes, 12 AD3d 532; cf. People v. Feuer, 11 AD3d 633).


Summaries of

People v. Jung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 2005
22 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Jung

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH JUNG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7390
801 N.Y.S.2d 537

Citing Cases

Simpson v. Bell

Indeed, the Second Department has repeatedly declined to reach unpreserved claims that a stop-deliberation…

People v. Soto

The defendant's challenge to the charge given by the trial court on the issue of justification is unpreserved…