From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Julian

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1977
43 N.Y.2d 733 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1977

Decided November 22, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, BUDD G. GOODMAN, J.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Jane Deutscher, Peter L. Zimroth and Robert M. Pitler of counsel), for appellant.

Diana A. Steele and William E. Hellerstein for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed. Defendant's use of his sock to hold a small package did not alone provide the two police officers with cause to stop and summon him to a police car, position him between them, and inquire about the package. Defendant's conduct, even in a high crime area, might just as well have been to secrete noncontraband valuables.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Julian

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1977
43 N.Y.2d 733 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Julian

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MICHAEL JULIAN, Also…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1977

Citations

43 N.Y.2d 733 (N.Y. 1977)

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

As near as can be ascertained three men sat in a late-model car for 15 minutes, looked at a building, and…

People v. Sobotker

That the officers, as one of them put it, "felt that a crime was about to be committed", sincere as this…