From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Joseph

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 5064 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2017–07202

07-05-2018

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Stephen JOSEPH, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Kirk R. Brandt of counsel), for appellant. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Kirk R. Brandt of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Barbara Kahn, J.), dated June 21, 2017, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant appeals from an order, made after a hearing, designating him a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C; hereinafter SORA).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 11 of the risk assessment instrument, since the People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant had a history of drug or alcohol abuse (see People v. Dipilato, 155 A.D.3d 792, 793, 63 N.Y.S.3d 525 ; People v. Dallas, 122 A.D.3d 698, 699, 995 N.Y.S.2d 618 ). Further, the defendant's contention that certain factors warrant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not raise these grounds at the SORA hearing (see People v. Figueroa, 138 A.D.3d 708, 709, 27 N.Y.S.3d 885 ). In any event, we agree with the County Court's determination that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure (see People v. Destio, 145 A.D.3d 1047, 1048, 45 N.Y.S.3d 487 ; People v. Quinones, 138 A.D.3d 1082, 1083, 28 N.Y.S.3d 899 ).

Accordingly, the defendant was properly designated a level two sex offender.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Joseph

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 5064 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Stephen JOSEPH, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 5, 2018

Citations

2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 5064 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
76 N.Y.S.3d 829

Citing Cases

People v. Cuspert

Here, the defendant's use of a dangerous instrument and history of substance abuse were established by clear…