From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1985
115 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 16, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

At plea, the court promised defendant that it would consider youthful offender treatment at sentencing. However, at sentencing, the court declined to grant defendant such treatment and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 1/2 to 4 1/2 years.

"[E]ligibility alone does not mandate youthful offender treatment. The granting of such benefit lies wholly within the discretion of the court" (People v Williams, 78 A.D.2d 642). Upon the present record we do not find any basis for finding that the court abused its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment, nor any basis for disturbing the sentence imposed. Mollen, P.J., Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1985
115 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERWIN JORDAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. The sentences imposed were not excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101…

People v. Smith

We disagree. The fact that defendant was only 18 years old and had no previous criminal record is not…