Opinion
08-26-2015
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert JONES, appellant.
Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.
Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.
Opinion Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), rendered February 27, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the third degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree, criminal use of a firearm in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, his waiver of his right to appeal was valid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Alleyne, 127 A.D.3d 776, 4 N.Y.S.3d 548 ; People v. McRae, 123 A.D.3d 848, 996 N.Y.S.2d 531 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ; People v. Barnes, 118 A.D.3d 904, 987 N.Y.S.2d 243 ; People v. Grzymalski, 116 A.D.3d 712, 982 N.Y.S.2d 785 ). Our review of the defendant's challenge to the adverse suppression ruling is precluded by his valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831, 833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 59, 724 N.E.2d 754 ; People v. Ward, 126 A.D.3d 730, 5 N.Y.S.3d 468 ).
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.