From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

248

March 15, 2002.

Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Mark, J.), entered March 11, 1999, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter alia, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts).

Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender, Rochester (James Eckert of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Howard R. Relin, District Attorney, Rochester (Loretta S. Courtney of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, SCUDDER, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of two counts each of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16), arising out of the sale of cocaine to an undercover police officer on two separate occasions. Over objection of defense counsel, who tried this case in defendant's absence, Supreme Court admitted an inculpatory statement made by defendant to codefendant immediately after they were arrested. Contrary to defendant's contention, the People were not required to provide a CPL 710.30 notice with respect to that statement because it was not made to the police or an agent of the police ( see, People v. Rivera, 173 A.D.2d 360, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1129; People v. Stewart, 160 A.D.2d 966).

Defendant further contends that the court erred in admitting in evidence a photograph identified by a police officer as depicting defendant. Defendant contends that the information printed on the photograph, i.e., his name, address and date of birth, bolstered the officer's identification of defendant ( see generally, People v. Trowbridge , 305 N.Y. 471, 475-477). Assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in admitting the photograph, we conclude that the error is harmless ( see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241-242; People v. Alshoaibi, 273 A.D.2d 871, 872, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 960).


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-respondent, v. AARON JONES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 15, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 790

Citing Cases

People v. Bryant

Contrary to defendant's further contention, County Court properly refused to suppress the statement defendant…

People v. Bryant

Contrary to defendant's further contention, County Court properly refused to suppress the statement defendant…