From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 7, 2015
130 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

15628, 3799/72, 4532/72

07-07-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Curtis JOHNSON, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Beth Fisch Cohen of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Beth Fisch Cohen of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), entered on or about June 25, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the designation as a sexually violent offender, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Defendant was properly adjudicated a level three sex offender. Clear and convincing evidence established that defendant was properly scored 30 points under the risk factor for number of victims (see People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 883 N.Y.S.2d 154, 910 N.E.2d 983 [2009] ). The court properly considered highly reliable proof of a pattern of associated sex crimes, since neither the Board nor the hearing court was limited to the underlying convictions (see People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 [1st Dept 2011] ; People v. Johnson, 77 A.D.3d 548, 909 N.Y.S.2d 716 [1st Dept 2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 705, 2011 WL 536611 [2011] ).

Defendant's contention that he should have received a downward departure is unpreserved because he made no such application to the hearing court (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, n. 5, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). In any event, we find no basis for such a departure.

As the People concede, a court making a redetermination under Doe v. Pataki, 3 F.Supp.2d 456 (1998) may not make a sexually violent offender designation (People v. Velez, 100 A.D.3d 847, 954 N.Y.S.2d 192 [2d Dept.2012], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 853, 2013 WL 1800534 [2012] ).

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, FEINMAN, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 7, 2015
130 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Curtis Johnson…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 7, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
11 N.Y.S.3d 486
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5881

Citing Cases

People v. Wright

In any event, this alleged mitigating factor was outweighed by the seriousness of defendant's sexual…

People v. Powell

As an alternative holding, the record also supports the SORA court's alternative finding that defendant…