Opinion
October 23, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Having failed to object to those portions of the jury charge of which he now complains, the defendant has not preserved those issues for appellate review (CPL 470.05) and we do not deem reversal in the interest of justice to be warranted.
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Brown, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.