From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1984
104 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

August 20, 1984

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

In light of the overwhelming proof of guilt and the court's curative instructions delivered in a timely fashion, we find that the prosecutor's conduct at trial and his summation did not so unduly prejudice defendant as to deprive her of a fair trial. We further find that with regard to a number of the claimed errors, no objections were made and therefore they were not preserved for review. However, we stress that we do not condone the conduct of the prosecutor during the course of the trial, nor his summation, and under other circumstances, the result might be different. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1984
104 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VERONICA JOHNSON, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 20, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Pipia

05; People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818), and the interest of justice does not warrant a reversal since any…

People v. Moya

Defendant has also failed to preserve for review his claim of error in the prosecutor's summation which…