From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jimenez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 2, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

05-02-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rosa JIMENEZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Oliver McDonald of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Oliver McDonald of counsel), for respondent.

ACOSTA, J.P., MAZZARELLI, MANZANET–DANIELS, WEBBER, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J. at plea; Marcy L. Kahn, J. at sentencing), rendered May 13, 2015, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing her to three years' probation, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's contention that the plea court failed to advise her of the true immigration consequences of her plea is unpreserved (see People v. Peque , 22 N.Y.3d 168, 182–183, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617 [2013], cert. denied 574 U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 90, 190 L.Ed.2d 75 [2014] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the court met its obligation under Peque (see id. at 196–197, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617 ) by warning defendant that there was "a good likelihood" that she "could" be deported, since Peque does not "require a plea court to ascertain whether a particular conviction carries mandatory deportation under federal law and advise a defendant accordingly" (People v. Manuel, 143 A.D.3d 473, 474, 38 N.Y.S.3d 551 [1st Dept. 2016], lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 1147, 52 N.Y.S.3d 299, 74 N.E.3d 684 [2017] ). In any event, even where deportation is legally mandatory, as a practical matter it still requires the immigration authorities to take the necessary actions, and thus the deportation consequences of defendant's plea could fairly be characterized as likely rather than absolutely certain.


Summaries of

People v. Jimenez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 2, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rosa JIMENEZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 2, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
52 N.Y.S.3d 717

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez-Abreu

However, the defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not entered voluntarily because the Supreme…

People v. Ramsood

Here, the record demonstrates that the Supreme Court, among other things, advised the defendant that "this…