From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jimenez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 1987
133 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

September 8, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, John J. Marotta is relieved as attorney for the defendant, the brief filed by him is deemed stricken, George Dunn of 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1166, New York, New York, 10170, is hereby substituted as the defendant's counsel and is directed to serve and file a brief in accordance herewith on or before October 15, 1987, and the respondent shall serve and file a supplemental brief on or before October 29, 1987.

Assigned counsel submitted a brief on behalf of the defendant in which he stated that "this appeal is without merit" prior to affirmatively arguing the only point which his client requested be raised on the appeal. As the Court of Appeals noted in its recent decision in People v. Vasquez ( 70 N.Y.2d 1, 4), counsel thereby disparaged the claim his client wanted addressed and "for all practical purposes, precluded his client [if he was so advised] from presenting [it] effectively in a pro se brief". Accordingly, new counsel must be assigned and consideration of the appeal deferred until the filing of further briefs. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jimenez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 1987
133 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM JIMENEZ, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 8, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

He concluded that the first of those "concerns" seemed to be "obviated" by his client's plea of guilty, and…

People v. Williams

While the defendant apparently wished to challenge the denial of a suppression motion without a hearing,…