From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jennings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 29, 2010
75 A.D.3d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 102144.

July 29, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Drago, J.), rendered April 30, 2008, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree.

Edward Fassett Jr., Duanesburg, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Stein and McCarthy, JJ.


After waiving indictment and consenting to be prosecuted by superior court information, defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree. Such plea was also in satisfaction of certain charges pending in another court, as well as any uncharged crimes involving the victim herein. Thereafter, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender, as promised, to a prison term of two years followed by 15 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.

Defendant's only contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. In light of his valid waiver of appeal, however, defendant is precluded from making such argument ( see People v Thomas, 71 AD3d 1231, 1233, lv denied 14 NY3d 893; People v Lewis, 70 AD3d 1068).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Jennings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 29, 2010
75 A.D.3d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Jennings

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NE W YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES JENNINGS JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 29, 2010

Citations

75 A.D.3d 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6254
904 N.Y.S.2d 680

Citing Cases

People v. White [3d Dept 10-7-2010

Defendant now appeals. Defendant's sole contention is that her sentence is harsh and excessive. Given…

People v. Spencer

Defendant's sole contention is that the sentence is harsh and excessive. However, in view of defendant's…