From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jennings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2001
281 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 20, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J. at hearing; George Daniels, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered November 10, 1998, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree (2 counts), assault in the second degree (2 counts) and reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years on each robbery conviction and 3½ to 7 years on each of the remaining convictions, unanimously affirmed.

Carol A. Remer-Smith, for respondent.

Aaron P. Micheau, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Ellerin, J.P., Lerner, Saxe, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress identification evidence. Defendant met a description that was sufficiently specific under the geographic and temporal circumstances presented herein. Therefore, the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant for investigative purposes, and was entitled to pat down and handcuff defendant as a safety precaution (see, People v. Allen, 73 N.Y.2d 378, 379-380). This detention was not elevated to an arrest when defendant was promptly taken to a nearby location for a showup identification by another officer, who had observed defendant during his efforts to escape (see, People v. Chalwell, 272 A.D.2d 217, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 889).

The hospital showup served the purpose of procuring a trustworthy identification while the victims' memories were fresh (see, People v. Blanche, 90 N.Y.2d 821; People v. Guiterrez, 270 A.D.2d 184) and was not conducted in an unduly suggestive manner. The victims viewed defendant separately, and without conferring.

A fair reading of the record establishes that defendant's claim that certain evidence should have been precluded for lack of CPL 710.30 notice was waived (see, CPL 710.30;People v. Kirkland, 89 N.Y.2d 903) and the issue involved was extensively litigated. In any event, any error in this regard would be harmless.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Jennings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2001
281 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Jennings

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JERMAINE JENNINGS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 141

Citing Cases

People v. Wallace

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the third…

People v. Santiago

Contrary to the further contention of defendant, his statements to the police were properly admitted in…