From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jennings

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 18, 2021
37 N.Y.3d 1078 (N.Y. 2021)

Opinion

No. 87 SSM 25

11-18-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jermaine JENNINGS, Respondent.

William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (Kenneth H. Tyler, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. John R. Lewis, Sleepy Hollow, for respondent.


William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (Kenneth H. Tyler, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

John R. Lewis, Sleepy Hollow, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order reversed, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not

determined on the appeal to that Court. Counsel's failure to challenge the verdict as repugnant did not render the representation ineffective because the issue was not clear-cut and dispositive given the jury charge (see People v. Rodriguez , 31 N.Y.3d 1067, 77 N.Y.S.3d 336, 101 N.E.3d 977 [2018] ).

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jennings

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 18, 2021
37 N.Y.3d 1078 (N.Y. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Jennings

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jermaine JENNINGS…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

37 N.Y.3d 1078 (N.Y. 2021)
155 N.Y.S.3d 150
177 N.E.3d 213

Citing Cases

People v. Jennings

The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree. The judgment was…

People v. Jennings

The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree. The judgment was…