From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jarvis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 13, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Since defense counsel extensively cross-examined the sole eyewitness to the murder with respect to his lengthy criminal record and the testimony sought to be elicited bore only upon collateral matters of general credibility, any error which may have been committed by the trial court in refusing to allow further inquiry into the witness' criminal background was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, People v. Allen, 67 A.D.2d 558, affd 50 N.Y.2d 898 on opn of Presiding Justice Mollen at App. Div.).

We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jarvis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Jarvis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DWAYNE BATES JARVIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Simpson

On the basis of the instant record, however, it appears that the defendant never sought to subpoena these…

People v. Chin

All facts relevant to Hu's credibility and motive were thus squarely placed before the jury. Merely because…