From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jannestil

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-18

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kersey JANNESTIL, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sean T. Masson of counsel), for respondent.



Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sean T. Masson of counsel), for respondent.
ANDRIAS, J.P., FRIEDMAN, MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered July 2, 2008, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of forgery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly imposed a felony sentence based on defendant's violation of his plea agreement. After being rejected by a drug program, defendant absconded, adopted an alias, remained at large for 10 years, and was returned on a bench warrant. Defendant thus forfeited the opportunity to have his felony conviction replaced by a misdemeanor conviction ( see People v. Jenkins, 11 N.Y.3d 282, 869 N.Y.S.2d 370, 898 N.E.2d 553 [2008] ). Although the court could have imposed a more severe sentence under the agreement, it imposed the minimum lawful sentence for a second felony offender.

Given the circumstances, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's new attorney's request for an adjournment to permit further preparation for sentencing, and that ruling did not deprive defendant of effective assistance of counsel ( see People v. Chappotin, 56 A.D.3d 327, 868 N.Y.S.2d 19 [1st Dept. 2009], lv. denied11 N.Y.3d 923, 874 N.Y.S.2d 8, 902 N.E.2d 442 [2009] ). Both the attorney and defendant addressed the court at sentencing, and “there is no reason to believe that counsel could have persuaded the court to impose a more lenient sentence if he had received more time to prepare” ( People v. Krasnovsky, 45 A.D.3d 446, 447, 846 N.Y.S.2d 132 [1st Dept. 2007], lv. denied10 N.Y.3d 767, 854 N.Y.S.2d 329, 883 N.E.2d 1264 [2008] ). There was no need for either counsel or the court to inquire into defendant's 2008 arrest in Queens County, or his immigration status, because neither of these factors played any role in defendant's sentence.

To the extent defendant may seek to vacate his plea, he must do so by motion in the trial court upon a proper evidentiary record.


Summaries of

People v. Jannestil

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Jannestil

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kersey JANNESTIL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
963 N.Y.S.2d 230
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2644

Citing Cases

People v. Hayes

Rivera1st Dept.: 105 A.D.3d 560, 963 N.Y.S.2d 230 (NY) Rivera,…

People v. Goddard

As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. Defendant violated the plea agreement and thus…