Opinion
March 22, 1999
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the hearsay testimony presented at the Wade hearing was insufficient to establish the confirmatory nature of the identification made by one of the witnesses (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Garcia, 216 A.D.2d 412; People v. Campbell, 187 A.D.2d 442). In any event, the contention is without merit (see, People v. Terry, 224 A.D.2d 202).
Since the People did not exhaust their peremptory challenges, the defendant's challenge to the removal of one of the prospective jurors for cause is not reviewable on appeal (see, CPL 270.20; People v. Velez, 223 A.D.2d 414).
The contention raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se brief is without merit.
S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.